China and the U.S. is in the debugging of each other

 Cold War bloc politics

not have come to be

the disappointment of the six-party talks. Do you think China and the U.S. on the Korean nuclear issue, how each mediation?

Zhou: Now the situation is still tense, but I think unlikely. China's goal is clear, one of peace and stability on the Peninsula, and the second is the denuclearization of the peninsula. These two objectives will not change.

foreign Johnson Zaibao stop large-scale recalls the warm state forest behind the taking of 23 million subsidy allegedly left Enron: Bank of North Korea this is really clever
the result of the Cold War, U.S. policy toward the DPRK has also adjusted. The Clinton administration, had the opportunity (to solve the Korean issue), but later for various reasons, without result. Bush administration adopted a hostile policy toward the DPRK, have become increasingly acute. In other words, the DPRK has no sense of security, particularly after the outbreak of war in Iraq, North Korea even more strongly this sense of insecurity. This is one reason why North Korea from developing nuclear weapons.

The problem is that nuclear weapons can bring security to the DPRK. In this regard, China believes that the fundamental interests from North Korea and proceed to consider safety, the DPRK should not have nuclear weapons. North Korean nuclear weapons might make even more unsafe.

2003 years, the parties held talks. Published by the The key now is implementation. At this stage, parties should be conducive to peace and stability of the peninsula, the peninsula's peace and stability that is conducive to it, rather than the reverse.

U.S. North Korea policy should be adjusted, no nonsense first is North Korea's regime change. Previously outspoken U.S. North Korean regime to be replaced, and even North Korea an This is also the origin of the Korean deep sense of insecurity.

North Korea has the right to peaceful use of nuclear energy, which is the right of any sovereign country has, of course, this right should be placed on the Korean Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson recently visited the United States after North Korea agreed to IAEA personnel to return to North Korea. Of course, agree to return to DPRK IAEA personnel or re-start work, is still difficult to judge. But the contact does not touch at least better than that.

I think the DPRK nuclear issue be resolved or there is hope, because the most fundamental one is that no one need war. U.S. dilemma in Afghanistan, Iraq, security issues have not been really resolved. I think that Americans want to see another war.

six-party talks including the DPRK nuclear issue and other issues of the Korean Peninsula, all parties. Proved, so far, the six-party talks still an effective mechanism. Although the negotiation process is difficult, but after all, go down. Of course, some people think that the six-party talks may not be appropriate, to propose some conditions. I think this work can be done to save it.

Do you agree with U.S. policy in Asia against China's view?

Zhou: Asia is very important to the United States, the United States had never left Asia. But the U.S. has recently increased its investment in Asia. George W. Bush era of American power concentrated in the Middle East and Afghanistan. Now the United States a free hand to increase the focus on Asia.

makes America feel the need to increase investment in Asia is that Japan, Australia, ASEAN and put forward various ideas on the integration of the Asia-Pacific, the United States worried about being marginalized in the process, The United States is hope I can continue to lead the integration process. U.S. unwilling to give up the leadership position in the Asia Pacific.

Asia's recent rapid development of emerging economies, the United States and emerging economies, there is a stage of adjustment and adaptation. Now we are in a mutual commissioning period. United States and China have their own interests in Asia, where China and the U.S. need to respect each other. This involves a mutual respect for each other's core interests, respect for the diversity of the world to respect their different values and path of development issues, which are reflected in the mutual respect among the needs.

One view is that the U.S. return to Asia not to contain China, but to miss the opportunity of development in Asia; United States intends to use part of the Asia-Pacific countries and China, the original conflict, is to better use of these services, their interests conflict. Approached the United States and these countries, does not mean China (impact) of the weaker, but proof of the relationship between China and these countries closer.

I think, the United States to strengthen investment in Asia, there is also against the Chinese side, we should be vigilant.

But times have changed, the Cold War military bloc could not have come to. Cold War bloc politics in ideological line is exclusive, not hesitate to engage in military confrontation. In the era of peaceful development, the U.S. military bloc politics difficult to organize. No country in Asia and the United States are willing to publicly stand against China.



Zhou: China's consistent position that China's South China Sea Islands and adjacent waters of the sovereign is no doubt.

can be divided into the South China Sea, South China Sea Islands and nearby waters, the issue of sovereignty, the exclusive economic zone beyond the exclusive economic zone waters issues and problems. Right light, is the misunderstanding of the United States to China. Right weight, is the United States to put pressure on China.

Southeast Asian countries have asked the U.S. to strengthen presence in Asia, the countries that most clearly unable to confirm this view.

in the more neighbors, relations between the two parties are improving. Vietnam is no reason to hamper bilateral relations. Vietnam is in the less developed ASEAN countries. China and the ASEAN FTA in the Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, tariffs on all taken care of. In bilateral issues, China has also given assistance to Vietnam. Vietnam land demarcation has been completed, the sea is also the end of the demarcation, of course, from time to time some disputes between the fishermen, which are to be two sides properly handle issues.

sovereignty over the islands on the South China Sea dispute, China continues to advocate At this point, China and Vietnam, or smooth communication channels. The key is to implement the existing agreements on bilateral issues and do not introduce a third party, because it is most unwise.