Guangzhou Nanfang Dushi Bao Chi mad approved the purchase contract

 Chi is bent on the purchase contract in Guangzhou should approved part to be improved, but also some of the arguments just happens to coincide with the Chi, both spark a collision, have shown a a good starting point is beyond reproach, his heart is obtained dozens of amendments are all certainly 204 to protect the interests of consumers, people admire; and Chi criticized the argument and the argument form contract, but also some exciting innovations Department. But they also say, not necessarily to the whole mad batch is just and reasonable. In their view, Guangzhou City, the format of a few changes of the text of the contract is in the process of continuous improvement, more standardized, but for now has become increasingly protective of consumers. For example, while Guangzhou   property management contract to sign, which Beijing is listening to something new. Guangzhou format of the contract is not without merit, the key is fair use, but with the 204 be compared, it just is more applicable. mad batch of Ye Hao, 204 worth mentioning, but which inevitably Abas Nishajuxia. with the latest 2002 Guangzhou Land and Housing Bureau, Guangzhou City of Industry, the format of the contract producer example: mad One batch: Payment and Term Focus: Why the buyer according to time of hire? vulnerability: the buyer at the time installment, then no matter how the progress of housing projects, even unfinished, and all must continue to perform shall be paid the contract until the House. This may be considerable damage to the interests of the buyer, facing a great risk. methods: Payment reference to the cooperation of developers and builders way to progress payments. This can be distributed to each stage of the risk, even if a problem occurs, you can brake in time, timely solution. Reaction: progress payments, increase after the end of the floor cross-section F, which coincides almost all people in the industry together in favor of the view. once you say it, we experience a deep savings to the way a long time that this innovative mechanisms must be implemented as soon as possible. Support rate: mad batch II: comprising a floor area of focus: What is a kit building area? measure comprising an area of how buyers? in particular how the size of the wall count? vulnerability: the development of mapping data is provided by the other side of the story, buyers want to know whether or not enough, you have to spend money to hire a professional surveying and mapping are used to measure, certainly increase their costs. Measures: The kit comprising the use of floor area to area. This will allow buyers to own a ruler to measure out enough. Response: Pricing of kit from the floor area to building area, is to prevent area error on the economic losses, this is progress, there is no need for further development to the kit used to calculate the area of what? industry that is open to question. In addition, 204 pairs of size requirements but also appears to be too harsh such as surveying and mapping in millimeters; both a mapping from the central government agencies issued by the agency measure the qualifications of professional management agencies to provide measurement data, the buyer can no complex measurement tools, alone in any of the meter stick on the market to buy measurements and other measurement tools to verify the need to buy a house ... ... so nuanced? Now is not correct total count slowly to promote Antao buy it? rating: mad batch of three: the area of error handling in focus: the current contract, error less than 0.6% in absolute terms (including the number), the buyers and sellers without any compensation. Why do not compensate? vulnerabilities: Duotuishaobu, perfectly justified, of course, bought a lot of area to make up the money, buy less to refund, 0.6% should be investigated. This should not be set by the government or not Tuibu. Measures: 0.6% of the line cancellation agreement, the option to check out in the area of error than the agreed 1%, the area of risk reduction more low. Response: Guangzhou lawyer, said it would be difficult operation. This ratio is proven to improve, the one reserved for mass production of the project will inevitably produce errors, the second is to consider claims of interoperability can be less than 6% .0 * do not care about This is most of the buyers and sellers can accept. As for the right to withdraw more than 1% to the idea of building, the developer of the risk of a sharp increase, will bring about obstacles to a smooth transaction. Support rate: mad batch of four: Buy the subject of liability for breach of the focus of late payment: is not as long overdue to be responsible? loophole: if not the buyer reasons, of course, without any penalty. approach: an additional sentence , the buyer does not assume any responsibility for late payment. planning, design changes agreed focus: Since it is a change, the contract did not reflect the original appearance and standards, how to determine the change? vulnerability: This area once a dispute, the owners in court, the burden of proof will be very difficult. approach: all related to the original data included in the contract, such as plans, etc., become the basis for before the change. Response: Add the raw data before the change should be, the relevant provisions of last year, there are introduced, such as requiring the advertising content in the contract, the facilities to write into contracts. But planning, not the developers the ability to unilaterally within the scope of mandatory it would be difficult. For example, a cell is about to pay the mortgage, the planning department survey found that, in order to stay this size and density of population, existing roads can not meet the need, at least not in the fire safety standards, requiring expansion of the road. Such planning can not take responsibility to change the developer. Support rate: mad batch of six: Four copies of the contract, the buyer of a focus: Why only four copies of the contract? buyer why only one? Vulnerability: Currently 80% of the buyers choose the mortgage purchase, a contract must be the original charge in the bank. If you need to court, the owners can not provide the original cases, there may not be established. way: more than several Indian Well, the buyer two copies, a charge banks a job in hand. reaction: the reaction on this clause Chi is the first laugh. Guangzhou, said the industry Although this is a minor issue, but also a problem, but it is also easy to solve the problem. Support rate: Chi told reporters, in fact, the format of the contract with Beijing, Guangzhou is similar to the relevant departments are a good first set, differ significantly. so he that everywhere, but the overthrow of the redo, and the unilateral interests in the maintenance of the negotiations on the basis of the conditions set out. of: Wang Zhuojiang