I understand the role of law: the fight against crime, reduce crime.
First crime the police have responsibility to monitor and punish the same time, the obligation to alert citizens and the victims, so that two-pronged approach to effectively combat crime and reduce crime. On those who indulge perjury citizens and victims of crime, the police also have the responsibility to punish under the law, in particular crime and not reporting the discovery of the citizens and victims also have a duty to punish, for the report, especially the victims of crime if the connivance not reported, leaving more people involved in crime, I think even the victims, the law should have provisions to punish this regard, because the observer knows to be against the victims found in the case they can not resist as, they will think this is normal behavior do not think a crime, and thus the scope of crime victim's connivance in the slowly expanding.
a person or a company, if he knows someone stealing property, rather than as, open eyes closed eyes, and slowly steal even find themselves stealing their own right, it is called a group of people, not as it used to be careful, but to go openly take. Perhaps this and other companies to compete for the idea, is to condone such behavior, so that others have had to eat sweet things to eat when he produced, and finally close the net, legal proceedings, reported the theft of lead who wants to be the loss of all the stolen back. I do not know how to define in the law of such behavior, if the victim intended for commercial purposes whom this case, deliberately disrupt the market for such order, connivance of the consequences of crime, I think the Government is the responsibility of regulators to crack down.
the recent heated debate about the hubbub of the Tomato Garden event, I do not know based on the above discussion, if that is the way Microsoft's behavior? for Microsoft , similar behavior since he had entered China many times since, had previously been to his victory. For this, nature and no different past, but the situation ten years ago is no longer a .10 years ago, the Chinese Internet not so popular software vendors to sell copies of software installed on a separate machine, then the anti-piracy tool for software piracy, discovery and supervision, and is at present not in the same language. Microsoft came to China, found is full of piracy, all of which the West accuses of our lack of protection of intellectual property rights, when most of the isolated computer, mobile CD hawkers, hit hard on piracy. Now it's different, the popularity of Internet, software anti-piracy means strong, that piracy and upgrading of supervision, which the company repeatedly used if inadequate protection of intellectual property rights in China, really knocked. For this, the two focus: Tomato Garden website available for download there how long? Network popular today, Microsoft's strong market extravagance, starting from there, he could not know that Tomato Garden event, if he did not condone reported a year or two, then I do not know whether this is the intention to disrupt the market behavior?; Windows XP could effectively to do to prevent piracy? network so popular, I would like to access the computer alone is not few, and even piracy, Microsoft is also questioning how much of the loss, on the contrary, networked computers, the license key for network authentication, piracy system Failure can be a very good program to use to prevent piracy, not to mention a technology leader like Microsoft, large companies, XP such a closed source system, like anti-piracy software is simply easy, unless he did not want this to maximum security. If Microsoft has also been brought against it, can not help but make me want to take a prostitute to describe Microsoft. clients give you the money he did not sue, clients do not give money but also makes her home in the cool, does not want to look for other clients of prostitutes, Finally, do not give money to turn against others.
Microsoft's victory in China again and again, can not help but admire his ability in public relations in China. Recently, Microsoft's monopoly in the discussion of the issue is not whether we care about monopoly, since have national laws to manage, I only know the following facts:
1, OOXML was forcibly established as international standards and rules to fully resolve his one and only Microsoft, but comes with a lot of property is not open, it is hard to believe that many private property can be a standard for all companies all have to move closer to the world of international standards;
2, now the technology is easy to do more than one chip on the motherboard integrated free operating system LINUX started function, basic Internet, edit documents in the desktop system. collecting online, with only scattered companies are doing, I do not know whether many companies in the Microsoft threats and temptations to do so torn Xiabu Qu product of another piece of the sky, there is no pre-installed windows costs. even pre-installed linux, and only individual major companies against Microsoft, for those small companies not to mention;
3, batch after batch of government software procurement, the national professional title to test even the computer proficiency test is to test the operation of Microsoft office use;
4, CCTV, Sina and other major sites, live video directly specified using the IE browser only.
a lot of us to see and do not see to tell us the facts, we can not do without the network in the contemporary, for certain needs, even if many are familiar with the computer system had to be forced to use windows, IE browser, not to mention those who are not familiar with computers.
we do not know is how many people the law with loopholes drilling, by some powerful interest groups and the collusion of local judges, doing things so that ordinary people down, but did not do to fight crime, reduce crime, the role, so that only the criminals have hit the small disadvantaged Take tolerate the kidnapping of the entire strength of their community, unfair competition, crowding out other people's big crime.
This is just some people, some blinded by the judge. If the true legal to act, crime will never escape legal sanction, emblem still will not change her solemn.
referred to the Government's support for open source, I think many people would think that the Government should not favor one side, it should be completely commercial, market forces free choice. But let us look at a lot of things in China are entirely market determined, the market is really free and equal competition, rather than being manipulated in some giant free?
a normal market should not rampant piracy, the use of piracy is a crime, corporate condone piracy is also a crime, the government is also ineffective against piracy crime. Our legal system is not perfect, the use of piracy in this area of crime is still blank, the same conniving in this regard is the enterprise space these two gaps, the Government should make up slowly.
Tomato Garden event, thieves should be punished, the existing provisions of law in this regard. network so popular, and now anti-piracy software is easy to do, especially for closed source software, at least those who do not understand computers can use it up. for monitoring corporate condone piracy this one, the Government should set up a monitoring body, for distribution to firmly crack down on piracy, the same software for copyright , its anti-piracy capabilities can not do at least, resolutely not let the market. For this one, get the market supervision department can take a modified version of pirated or, if a person not familiar with the computer fitted with normal use, then the the level of anti-piracy software, do not enough, we should let the enterprise re-released. It's like a woman, a woman dressed in normal clothes, but some women in order to attract others attention, or just to attract clients to their dolled herself up or, worse, is to naked, hungry people in a group of wandering, and people like the person who had sexual relations, others do not give money, we blame others accused of plagiarism or the prostitutes? law on prostitutes and their clients are have appropriate management provisions, but for business, especially the software, we do not, a lot of copyrighted software, is in such a naked, the functions of government should allow all bare buttocks of a woman dressed again out? this piece of software just as effective.
our market is controlled by some giant company that, like a super brothel, and released a group of naked women disrupting the market, those of normal company, launched on their own hard work , with their own labor services to the public without a man, dying, slowly closing down.
tomato garden site, is said to exist for 5 years.
5 years, Microsoft has to be aware of its existence, his own connivance responsibility. if it intentionally for commercial purposes, on more responsibility.
Similarly, we are also responsible for the functions of government departments, management and supervision responsibilities. For the police, the police to the scene, the perpetrator if the victim shield The victim has the responsibility, but police found evidence of a crime if the sit idly by, the police also have the responsibility. In 5 years time, we do not know whether the functions of departments and Microsoft, and tomato garden site has been negotiated, such a thing even the presence of a 5-year long, incredible.
functions we may also tell what is a crime, this is very serious lack of responsibility. antipiracy, maintaining good social order and market order, is not there waiting, We open one eye, close one eye, the center for Microsoft people wants. a lot of crime is the crime charged is not to Microsoft, Microsoft is not accused of, stealing the fact that there is also a crime. please Ah, the Government really crack down on piracy good market order is a major event benefits the country. Please functions of the government departments can really do the people's baton, and not Microsoft's baton, which he said hit play which, when he said want to fight, nothing time to play. For piracy, please resolutely crack down, regardless of whether Microsoft charges for the theft, please resolutely combat! spread piracy, pirated, is a crime, please stringent legislation and implementation. our world, too many choices, No not missing anyone, people can endure pain, once adjusted, will find another piece of free sky!
previous reviews, to focus to Microsoft's strategy and ineffective law enforcement body. For those who steal, accept punishment is only right and proper. The following cases have been combined with a number of domestic and foreign, to see whether the composition of garden theft, and what responsibility he should pay.
tomato garden is correct Microsoft and law enforcement agencies hold the two to live: 1, the original Microsoft XP system modifications and dissemination; 2, in the modified version of the plug in the integration of these ads to make money.
for these two points, let us combine the existing cases and analyze the phenomenon now exists. China piracy rampant, the West and the United States, very few of their piracy, law-making and implementation are in place, their approach in this area have a lot to learn from our place, then let us look at some of the phenomenon in their country.
Some time ago a very hot fried apple iPhone, and some of his outlets are operators, only in certain use of network operators. but iPhone was released to some people crack their software so that it no longer subject to such restrictions, this break, they can openly in the iPhone store next to the open side of the iPhone to use their break to make money, there also exists the garden two live events are correct, in the United States, Apple take this nothing can be done, can only improve own software and in the subsequent launch of the improved mobile phone.
If someone says this and the garden are not comparable, that iPhone is a physical phone, but XP is just software, we then let's use a common phenomenon in the West of it. We found that many software cracked version is from the west, spread around the Internet, or even crack the names of the authors, as blatant in cracking software and cracker inside. to the kind of strict implementation of their legal standards that have long The software maker to court is to do a prison. But the West is not so, they still live very happy, they use their eyes to steal our technology to make money.
This is just the two of us common widespread phenomenon, there are many similar cases. For example, recently saw a line in the sohu, readers can see for yourself, not described here, the interested can see the connection:
.
a lot of facts show that In the West, in the interests of both parties in dispute, they did not court the balance of justice tilt to either side. This confrontation spear and shield, and promote the cracking and anti-cracking technology, they did not impose restrictions on the contrary, for have the means to resist piracy does not actually go to use the law does not protect them, not to mention a time-related intentionally dragged a few years.
the contrary, we see a lot of domestic phenomenon, from the Peng Yu porcine case of trial judges, as well as coral, Xu Ting, what our judges to tilt the balance. If the two equal, and they have been similar disputes do not like the way the trial, the punishment and sin concentrated in one body. Maybe the judge is to play a deterrent role, is to make ordinary people to see, using the bank's vulnerability to make money how to be punished, if the loss is not a bank, but a person, the judge will not None of the decisions to do the first instance. Our laws are fair, but by many judges to execute completely changed, and become all-pervasive interest groups are tentacles to attack vulnerable groups by thugs.
comments again point Tomato Garden After the law enforcement agencies, Microsoft, and tomato garden for figurines fault I think my point of view in the text has been very clear. as the event spectators, and non-IT industry rules experts and familiar with the legal provisions related to persons a layman, to make a few non-professionals are eligible to comment on things, whether the point of view into their stuff, it does not matter to me, on each side lug all my fault, although there are a lot of people reject my views, but still can not block I have to say, the following words will offend more people out.
or for general use a modified version pirated, cracked version of the people, is actually a group of theft, theft of more people, by many seen to be normal behavior. If the law is one thing to have a clear responsibility of the object, and that is that the whole group of people.
Western IT industry has a lot of things we can learn, we are now on the road experienced the phenomenon, they have experienced the process of taking over, I think they also experienced a lot of exploration and analgesia, was developed to such a situation. They use piracy, revision and cracking behavior of software in general The reality, as a theft and other shameful acts of the same items, people naturally follow the normal life of the specification using genuine. I think they're in the development process, such as we found the current situation, when there have been those who break , modify those things communicators into the prison, and perhaps their subsequent experience has shown that this approach is a temporary solution, for they are now, such behavior is not enough on the offense, if there is any need to be pursued only to investigate the use of the responsibility. the Internet age, I do not know what the attacker for what kind of ideas, whether for money or mischief psychology, what they have lost them on the Internet has not been as much the fault of in the use of genuine consensus of the society, such behavior is only some marginal people in such a spread, the community will not meet a lot of harm. and this software crack and anti-cracking process is also promoting the development of technology. Social mainstream use of the genuine, and only believe that genuine fear of the software is not the normal channels of their own privacy and security of the injury, and healthy development of the software industry, reasonable price and high quality service ...
if we pursue in-depth , resulting in social groups of the root causes of crime, that is, monopoly terms of the King and government law enforcement agencies do not do is, the consequences of such conduct merits half and half. popularization of computers on our initial, very few people use, the hardware and software are very expensive, if its software on Microsoft's strict control, the computer would not be so quick to spread; if the initial law enforcement agencies to develop a good implementation of strict rules, as in the West may still be able to form a consensus piracy is theft, but universal application of the computer slow and limited, IT industry would not be so rapid development. the merits of this half, for Microsoft, whether he is intentionally or unintentionally, rampant piracy has become his monopoly of the fact that sitting; for us to quickly development thanks to our government, but the law enforcement is not the same as the consequences of not shirk its responsibility. If there is any lesson to be learned, that is, the formation of legitimate business competition and monopoly control of government and rules and implement to make our society healthy development. While the fact that Microsoft has formed a monopoly, but a culture of free software and reasonable so that he virtually had a great loss; our IT though unprecedented prosperity, but the order of chaos and corruption of the industry social atmosphere for the further development of our future is extremely limited.
Let us once again return to the Tomato Garden event itself, for as figurines, all the sin and blame are we focused on their hands, and I do not know if this is fair, one thing, a lot of forces greater responsibility, we focus the confused sin and a tiny little people. Take the West as a reference, such behavior is not enough on crime, if there is any responsibility, also fail to get his head. but we did not reach that level, after all, he violated some of our law, whether a criminal offense and how the confiscation of illegal gains, its own legal experts to the appropriate not repeat them here; for Microsoft, piracy sit back and watch his 5-year, and he did not do on the piracy of software control, and revision of all the crack confrontation in the West that strict law enforcement system, and his complaint protection of the law will not be in China to investigate what decent people's mistakes?; for our law enforcement agencies, they virtually sit sit has become Microsoft's monopoly, the lack of enforcement, what face to Microsoft's monopoly investigation?; for our people in the illegal groups, the lack of government enforcement, there is no monopoly of good control, causing the entire software industry and the sluggish development of other platforms, so that people do not have a very convenient number of options, We are mortal beings, and our law enforcement officials, what qualifications we feel insecure?
reform and opening up, many of our industry has begun a blank, open the door, a scourge, a strict rule in the absence of control and into the next , through a lot of integration of the collision, the rapid development of our world today. Here I pick all the problems though, but the emergence of these problems, all the good aspects are also produced in the invisible, intangible benefit all of us, In order to better development in future, to establish a good system of rules, enterprises and governments need to better assume their responsibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment